In 2025, GlobalData released a trilogy of granularized reports. These reports take a deep look into the complicated and rapidly shifting regulatory landscape for artificial intelligence (AI). These reports, collectively titled Global AI Regulatory Landscape, analyze how regulations must adapt to keep pace with rapidly advancing technology while ensuring that innovation is not stifled. These results underscore that the global AI regulatory landscape is becoming increasingly fragmented. There are crucial distinctions between the EU, the US, and Chinese approaches.
This series of reports is designed to shine a light on these challenges that policymakers face. Yet they fail to write rules that have staying power in our speed-of-light, innovation-or-bust environment. GlobalData urges regulators to ensure that they do not stifle innovation in an attempt to regulate a technology that is fundamentally innovative and future-facing.
Diverging Approaches to AI Regulation
AI regulatory frameworks are strikingly different between transatlantic partners. The EU is aiming for a new strategy that puts consumer protection at the fore, putting the rights and safety of individuals using AI technologies first. In stark contrast, the US regulatory approach has focused on protecting companies, especially those researching and developing AI tech to use in their businesses.
China’s regulatory stance is primarily concerned with government interests, seeking to ensure that the state’s control and influence over AI technology remain intact. This divergence in regulatory philosophies highlights the challenge of creating a unified global standard for AI governance.
“The EU’s approach aims to protect the consumer. The US approach prioritizes protecting businesses, particularly AI companies, while in countries like China, AI regulation seeks to protect the government.” – Global AI Regulatory Landscape report.
Advocacy Reports across the globe show that meaningful AI legislation is still months or years away. In the UK as well, proposed copyright reservation mechanisms have met with substantial pushback.
The Imperative of Legal Certainty
As policymakers continue to move through this quagmire of technology, the need for clearer regulations is obvious. Indeed, businesses and creators alike are already navigating a difficult environment with no clear copyright regimes in place. This ambiguity might have a chilling effect on investments in AI because companies need legal certainty before they invest significant resources.
“What is true is that legal certainty is paramount for companies that need to make investment decisions on AI, and a lack of regulation could discourage investments in the long run.” – Global AI Regulatory Landscape report.
GlobalData’s report shows that heavy-handed regulation can be balanced with innovation. Counterintuitive as it may seem, these burdensome regulations don’t have to crush creativity and innovation. In the meantime, both the EU and China have emerged as significant actors in the global AI race. Thirdly, they are shaping the global regulatory agenda.
“However, there is no evidence that a higher level of regulation is detrimental to innovation, as both the EU and China are key players in AI while also shaping the AI regulatory agenda.” – Global AI Regulatory Landscape report.
Strategic Alignment with International Standards
Companies that proactively align themselves with international standards and risk management frameworks may find themselves at a competitive advantage when regulations fully take effect.
“Companies that already align with international standards (where available) and management risk frameworks will have an advantage over their competitors when regulation becomes fully applicable.” – Global AI Regulatory Landscape report.
The reports provide practical direction and first-hand, real-world examples to help practitioners reach the 36 leading media outlets. You can buy them from $995.