The Trump administration has stepped up its attacks against Harvard University. They further argue that the institution has failed to take sufficient action to prevent and respond to antisemitism on its campus. As for executive actions, few are as bold as this administration’s unilateral cancels of external grants from the National Science Foundation (NSF) and National Institute of Health (NIH). This decision will have far-reaching consequences for research funding in many fields—including engineering—and will hit dozens of faculty members directly.
On a single day, Harvard received notification via internal emails around 10 p.m. that it would lose funding for multiple projects, including three grants tied to Vijay Janapa Reddi, an associate professor of engineering and applied science at the university. Reddi’s expertise in computer architecture extends to edge devices, such as smartphones and autonomous vehicles. The abrupt loss of funding has raised concerns among faculty members about the future of their research and the broader implications for academic freedom.
They had also demanded that the university do more to combat antisemitism on campus. This step marked a significant escalation in the administration’s ongoing scrutiny of universities perceived to be hostile towards Jewish students and scholars. The administration had previously indicated its dissatisfaction with various institutions regarding their handling of antisemitism, but the termination of Harvard’s federal grants signifies a more direct approach to enforcing compliance.
Taken together, the three grants at issue were absolutely vital to Harvard’s research momentum and efforts. Those NSF and NIH dollars powered a diverse array of critical projects in all disciplines. Ending this support now will have devastating effects on the years of work currently being invested in research and development. After these cuts, Harvard now stands to lose nearly $1 billion in federal funding. This move comes on the heels of other withdrawals, including a deeply troubling 27% decrease in total enrollment at the public university.
This spring the Trump administration threatened to pull all of Harvard’s remaining federal contracts. This decision deepened the uncertainty surrounding the institution’s financial future. This move has prompted responses from various sectors within academia, as many faculty members worry about the implications for innovative research and the academic community as a whole.
Even in the face of these challenges, Vijay Janapa Reddi is upbeat about the state of American higher education and research. He is convinced that institutions like Harvard will remain at the center of the world’s quest for knowledge and innovation. Reddi’s research on edge devices, including always-on smartwatches, has been especially news-worthy in its potential to disrupt industries as varied as healthcare to entertainment. Given the narrowing scepter of the recent gestures by the Trump administration, his legacy lies within both present-day and future endeavors.
Harvard University has not responded publicly to the details of the terminated grants. It misses the mark as it reaffirms its commitment to combat antisemitism and create an inclusive environment for all students. The university’s administration faces a critical juncture as it navigates the repercussions of federal funding cuts while responding to the administration’s demands.
>