TikTok Reaches Major Agreement Amid Controversies Over Data Security

TikTok, a social media platform owned by the Chinese company ByteDance, has been embroiled in controversy in the United States for several years. Wondering whether the Chinese government could access user data has sparked intense discussions. These conversations are all centered around the app’s security and the potential banning of the app from the U.S….

Lisa Wong Avatar

By

TikTok Reaches Major Agreement Amid Controversies Over Data Security

TikTok, a social media platform owned by the Chinese company ByteDance, has been embroiled in controversy in the United States for several years. Wondering whether the Chinese government could access user data has sparked intense discussions. These conversations are all centered around the app’s security and the potential banning of the app from the U.S. Recent developments threaten to upend this saga completely. An agreement that pacifies lawmakers’ security concerns is that TikTok has belatedly entered into a formal divestment agreement with American investors.

The theater about TikTok first flared up in August 2020. That’s when then-President Donald Trump signed an executive order mandating the ban of transactions with ByteDance. This executive order was based on national security arguments, which Trump asserted that TikTok was a danger to users’ information. A U.S. This is a positive development for TikTok and means that the app can continue to operate while the legal battle plays out in the courts. This legal breathing room provided the rare opportunity for the platform to negotiate its long-term future in the United States.

Then in early December of this year, TikTok made a strong move to address its contentious reputation. The company signed an agreement for a consortium of American investors to buy the majority of its U.S. operations. This structure is meant to give ultimate control of the still-to-be-formed platform back to U.S. investors and allay any national security concerns. The deal is still a significant change of course. President Trump, who previously wanted to ban the app entirely, is now reportedly amenable to a 50-50 ownership deal between app parent company ByteDance and an as-yet-undetermined American company.

ByteDance claimed in a public statement that it is committed to keeping TikTok available to American users. The firm strongly contests any claims of endangering security. There they claim that everything users store in the U.S. complies with applicable laws locally. Worry over the app’s availability to U.S. users still looms, despite the reassurances. This would put millions of creators—the very artists, entrepreneurs, and professionals who make the platform vibrant and compelling to engage with—on the knife’s edge as a ban threatens.

In January 2026, TikTok announced the establishment of the TikTok USDS Joint Venture LLC to comply with President Trump’s executive order. Three investors teamed up on this one, each taking a 15% share of the venture. United and Continental as a combined entity jointly own 45% of the domestic U.S. operation. The order has already blessed the sale of TikTok’s U.S. business to an American investor group. Today’s decision is significantly good news in light of continuing negotiations on the app’s fate.

President Trump said President Xi Jinping of China signed off on the TikTok deal in 2025. This announcement created a wave of optimism for a breakthrough to the months-long negotiations. Fifth, pretend this approval marks a general thaw in U.S.-China technology/trade relations. Both countries are undoubtedly most interested in finding ways to avoid the thorny intersection of geo-politics and economic nationalism.

Despite TikTok’s success, the platform is facing one of the most precarious moments in its short history. Furthermore, it is completely committed to user safety and compliance with U.S. regulations. The social media platform has become the catch-all space that’s trapped thousands of creators who now rely on it for their livelihoods. A new ban or restrictions would have a devastating impact on their livelihoods. It would further undermine their ability to engage with their constituents.