26-Year-Old Sentenced for Hacking SEC’s X Account to Manipulate Bitcoin Prices

On Friday, Eric Council Jr., a 26-year-old black man, was sentenced to 14 months in jail. He was sentenced due to his involvement in the breach of the official X (formerly Twitter) account of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This case is a stark reminder of the mounting challenges faced by regulatory…

Lisa Wong Avatar

By

26-Year-Old Sentenced for Hacking SEC’s X Account to Manipulate Bitcoin Prices

On Friday, Eric Council Jr., a 26-year-old black man, was sentenced to 14 months in jail. He was sentenced due to his involvement in the breach of the official X (formerly Twitter) account of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This case is a stark reminder of the mounting challenges faced by regulatory oversight agencies to protect digital platforms from malicious cyber activity.

Supplementing the sentence are three years of supervised release. This should illustrate the depravity of the offense. The Council’s conduct undermined the independence of the SEC’s communications. Perhaps in an effort to further manipulate market behavior, they tried to manipulate the market by artificially inflating Bitcoin prices through misinformation.

In September 2022, Council, along with co-conspirators, hacked into the SEC’s X account. They distributed inaccurate data that deceived investors and speculators, resulting in a drastic increase in Bitcoin’s worth. This event caused a national concern over the threat posed by cybersecurity attacks on government and financial systems.

The hacking incident sparked widespread concern from law enforcement and regulatory agencies. After investigation, federal authorities were able to trace the fraud scheme back to Council and his associates. Their actions showed a masterful grasp of the interplay between technology and market forces, with dire consequences.

In court, prosecutors argued that accountability was necessary following this type of cybercrime. They claimed Council’s actions had destroyed public confidence in financial institutions and created serious hazards to investors. The court found that persuasive in the end, leading to Friday’s sentence.